| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARTBOOK BLOGEventsStore NewsMuseum Stores of the MonthNew Title ReleasesStaff PicksImage GalleryBooks in the MediaExcerpts & EssaysArtbook InterviewsEx LibrisAt First Sight2025 Gift GuidesFeatured Image ArchiveEvents ArchiveDATE 7/4/2026 Declarations of Independence: America at 250DATE 6/30/2026 SUMMER SALE! Save 75%DATE 6/24/2026 McNally Jackson Seaport presents Ann Temkin, Michelle Kuo, Joseph Logan and Josh Kline on Marcel DuchampDATE 6/17/2026 Type Books presents the Toronto launch of 'Paul P.'DATE 6/15/2026 Type Books presents Derek McCormack and Kara Hamilton for the Toronto launch of 'The Shithole Opry Collector’s Guide'DATE 6/13/2026 'Fire Island Modernist'—architectural goldmine and a portal to a lost generationDATE 6/12/2026 We will miss David HockneyDATE 6/11/2026 For NIGO, creative inspiration is "like catching air"DATE 6/9/2026 Join us at the Summer Atlanta Gift & Home Market 2026DATE 6/9/2026 A centennial celebration of Marilyn Monroe, in all her complexityDATE 6/7/2026 The reaching never ends in 'Love & Lightning'DATE 6/3/2026 She Knows Who She Is…DATE 6/2/2026 Gregory R. Miller & Co., Greene Naftali Gallery and Cora Cohen Trust announce the launch of 'Cora Cohen' | THOMAS EVANS | DATE 5/3/2011Charles Avery: Onomatopoeia (Walther König/Koenig Books, London, 2011)Of the many inspired curatorial concepts that Harald Szeemann devised in the course of his career, one of the most suggestive was “individual mythologies.” Szeemann debuted the term as the guiding thesis of the legendary Documenta 5, 1972; he later explicated it (in an interview with Hans Ulrich Obrist collected in the latter’s A Brief History of Curating) as “intense intentions that can take diverse shapes: people create their own sign systems, which take time to be deciphered.” Nebulously broad as this may sound, what Szeemann intended by “individual mythologies” was an art in which a unified system, or world view or cosmology manifests itself across a range of media—via a repertoire of signs and symbols, as in Marcel Broodthaers’ eagles, pipes and bricks, or Matt Mullican’s generic Isotype symbols; or through allegory, as in the cosmologies of William Blake, or Paul Thek, whom Szeemann included in the 1972 Individual Mythologies show. Such cosmologies would operate independently of existing religious, scientific and philosophical systems (though inevitably borrowing from them).The Island’s port is named Onomatopoeia, and this second volume in what Avery envisages as a multivolume encyclopedia on The Islanders gives a detailed rendering of what the local businesses and flyposter ads around the port of a philosophical allegory might look like: ![]() “If the drawings are compelling, it is because of the sheer effort I got to and my earnest attempt to portray a place to the best of my abilities,” Avery told a recent interviewer. “It’s as though I have an intense conviction about how this place and its people look.” The Islanders differs from other artistic mythologies in which symbolism is often privileged over description, as Avery’s drawing skill takes the enterprise almost to the realm of the virtual in its illustrative zeal; perhaps it also helps obviate the hazard of author-centric solipsism particular to individual mythologies. With each new installment in the project, Avery throws open another vista onto a fresh corner or hinterland of his philosophical playground. |
